However, it seems that all human philosophers’ work on AI is behind on actual state of affairs.
Let me agree again — LLMs are how author describes manipulation of frames of reference of language, only. Sensorimotor stuff is just not there.
But… LLMs are only a fraction, albeit popular one, of the mind-boggling development of modern AI.
AI is not bound by language, it’s a pattern-seeking tech. We have image and video generation. They work with pixel FoR. We have 3D modeling AI. We have chemical and math science AI. In a way, this tech doesn’t care if we feed it language, or visual, or audio or any other patterns. Actually motorized, multi-PoV devices, are coming.
Then, once we have device that can teuly experiment, with some physical tools that we will give it, that’s really it - it would observe and build FoR in truly multi-modal fashion, and each axis will be way superior of human capacity.
So, I think all analysis that is coming up is description why this one specific part of the elephant is not “it”. Well, yes. We will soon have so many parts…
All true, no doubt.
However, it seems that all human philosophers’ work on AI is behind on actual state of affairs.
Let me agree again — LLMs are how author describes manipulation of frames of reference of language, only. Sensorimotor stuff is just not there.
But… LLMs are only a fraction, albeit popular one, of the mind-boggling development of modern AI.
AI is not bound by language, it’s a pattern-seeking tech. We have image and video generation. They work with pixel FoR. We have 3D modeling AI. We have chemical and math science AI. In a way, this tech doesn’t care if we feed it language, or visual, or audio or any other patterns. Actually motorized, multi-PoV devices, are coming.
Then, once we have device that can teuly experiment, with some physical tools that we will give it, that’s really it - it would observe and build FoR in truly multi-modal fashion, and each axis will be way superior of human capacity.
So, I think all analysis that is coming up is description why this one specific part of the elephant is not “it”. Well, yes. We will soon have so many parts…